Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: 34 meter/102 ft. TARD (video)

  1. Header
  2. Header-59

BLiNC Magazine, always served unfiltered
  1. #1

    34 meter/102 ft. TARD (video)

    Hey ...finaly got something put together on Spence's. Day blazing,
    Rail Bailing, TARD.
    Got it compressed down to ,"850 kb 22 seconds long", so its a easy
    fast down load. Even if your Sucking Off the phone-Line it will only
    take about 5 Min.
    Spence say's...... " Hey , sub-100's, No Problemo."

    http://www.skydivingmovies.com/ver2/...n=file&id=1866
    .
    .
    .

  2. #2

    Re: 34 meter/102 ft. TARD (video)

    Bounce Proof proves legit
    gee Spence...you had plenty of canopy time, ha ha ha
    Nice one brother !
    crazy Canadian.

  3. #3

    Re: 34 meter/102 ft. TARD (video)

    2 words, Low : Sick

    Nice work............

  4. #4
    ManBird
    Guest

    Re: 34 meter/102 ft. TARD (video)

    Nice! Very well done... both the jump and the video. The fact that Ray assembled and uploaded a video of the jump is as astounding as the jump itself. Spence did OK, too, I guess.







    I can't believe someone ever went for a *normal* jump there. Oops!

  5. #5
    baseninja
    Guest

    Re: 34 meter/102 ft. TARD (video)

    Ray/Spence, what canopy were you using in the video?

  6. #6

    Re: 34 meter/102 ft. TARD (video)

    Fox 245 v-tec/no valves, loaded 0.70, brakes stowed, no tailgate, rear riser 'flare', variable headwind of 2 - 5 mph.

    The wind was the biggest concern for a couple of reasons.
    1) Distortion of the 'pack' at launch...re: asymetric inflation, lineover or off heading.
    2) Lack of forward drive for decent flare/PLF.

    I could have held onto the pack a fraction of a second longer to pressurise things better. Opening would have been a little smoother and faster. Otherwise went as planned.

    My approach to low altitude, be it S/L, dbag, PCA, FF.....as long as you get bottom skin pressurisation, you are not going to die...

    ...however degree of injury may vary

  7. #7
    xof711
    Guest

    Talking Re: 34 meter/102 ft. TARD (video)

    Nice video man! Next time try to pull a gainer :-p
    I believe a Canadian just kicked the Aussies ass ahah!

    D.

  8. #8
    cygnus
    Guest

    Re: 34 meter/102 ft. TARD (video)

    ello! Mary Poppins! When are you goona come tard into my neighborhood and take care of my Kid and sing songs? Nice work!

    Kris

  9. #9
    ManBird
    Guest

    Re: 34 meter/102 ft. TARD (video)

    I'll be there this weekend, doing the "on-ramp". The difference between Spence and I, amongst many, many other things, is that I'm not freefalling it.

  10. #10
    cj
    Guest

    Re: 34 meter/102 ft. TARD (video)

    I remember doing a p/a over water from the same altitude five years ago, just to see how much canopy time we would get. We did conclude we'd never dare to attemt the same jump over anything but water (and I still wouldn't)... I'm just amazed by the skills and how the jump is conducted. You even make it look easy

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: December 23rd, 2011, 11:22 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 14th, 2010, 06:20 AM
  3. basejumping tard 3
    By blinc in forum News Feeds
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: September 16th, 2009, 07:26 AM
  4. tard.jpg
    By mknutson in forum wiki_images
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: June 8th, 2009, 07:41 AM
  5. Tard
    By mknutson in forum Video BASE
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: August 21st, 2008, 07:50 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •