OK...I've found a better composite image of the 100' bridge jump made back in 1986. See attachment. You can see that it's made up from a series of stills stuck together side by side and vertically. Start from top right and work left. When you get to the left hand side then pan down and back across to the right. This composite makes the viaduct look much more impressive than it really was (is), because there are not of course so many high (?) arches.
I've had this picture up in the attic for years & just got it down. Unfortunately it's too wide to scan in one go. I had to scan in 4 goes & use a panorama package to stitch the sections together. You can see that the stitch didn't work perfectly in some places...but you get the idea.
More details of this old stuff are posted under the Golden Gate Bridge question thread, in the Beginners section..if anyone is really interested in this old stuff. If not...then just ignore.
100' was pretty 'marginal' back in 1986. I guess it still is now...but someone would probably freefall it with modern kit. 100' was a 'pessimum' height for me then...but it was what was available. Higher was better...more time to get things right. Lower was better...less impact speed if things go wrong. Does anyone do 100' freefall ???
This bridge has water to land in...but it's not vey deep. Most of it you can stand up in.
If I get +ve feedback from this thread then I'll see what other old stuff from the 80's and 90's I can dig out. Is anyone interested ? Does anyone care about early BASE history....or is it all on record somewhere else already?
2Cats
Bookmarks