Well well well.
Now that in this part of the world time is passing, during which time number of partecipants is slowly growing, and same partecipants go scouting new BASE sites, we are starting to spot certain sites that are definitely "water jumps".
I could be considering buying a rig for water jumps, and so a question rises up naturally.
Granted that by now we are "expert" about opening times/heights of valved/non-valved Flik's/Fox's/Black Jack's/Troll's, in the sense that we know that we can jump with a (disputable!!!) safety margin:
32 m - 105 ft in DB
37 m - 121 ft in SL
60 m - 197 ft in freefall
(of course, the above numbers can vary from group to group and from jumper to jumper)
for those out there who consider themselves "expert" in (packing and) jumping water round BASE parachutes (as H2O and Tektite), and knowing that water round BASE parachutes open "slower" than square parachutes (Fox/Flik/BlackJack/Troll),
What could be the jumpable heights (for water jumps) with same (see above) safety margin when using a water round BASE parachute for, let's say (I won't consider DB water jumps with a round):
1) water SL jumps with a round?
2) water freefall jumps with a round?
Heights that can be comparable to "my" 37 m and 60 m?!?!?!?!?
I know that I will get lots of different answers, but I would like to have an opinion like:
If you jump with a valved Fox X m in SL and Y m in freefall, you will have the same "safety margin"(1) jumping a H2O/Tektite from (X+W) m in SL over water and from (Y+Z) m in freefall over water.
·
Thanks so much
·
·
(1) granted that we are jumping over water, I would like to know which are the correspondent increase in height jumping a round (with respect to jump a square) supposing we are jumping over "solid earth", in the sense that there could be certain water jumps where we don't know if the water level under the surface is 1 m or 10 m. Using a water jump equipment is because we definitely are going to get wet, but staying on the safe side considering that there could be "only" 1 m of water depth (and then rocks, which in one case we know could be very, very likely).
Bookmarks