Tree wrote:
"This seemed logical since you have to show an ID anyway, and that said ID would be all that any resourceful law man would need to verify that you were not a "risk" to the bridge."
This is exactly right, "...said ID would be all that any resourceful law man would need to verify that you were not a "risk" to the bridge." Requiring us to give our SSN's is just a kneejerk power grab and totally unnecessary for law enforcement purposes. Have you ever had to give your SSN to get on a commercial airliner in this country? duh.
There is no way in hell that the West Virginia State Department of Transportation is going to let the BDC shut down both sides of the Bridge. Not gonna happen. Who is going to check all of those trucks and cars that will cross and how with the checking be performed? Not gonna happen. Are they going to have SAM placements to guard the bridge from airstrike? no.
This is a joke and nothing more than an example of a small town wanting a piece of the homeland security action - a town intoxicated by a need for and opportunity to gain self-importance.
Bookmarks