View Full Version : Multi-Rubber
CrazyThomas
October 14th, 2008, 10:29 AM
So, I was packing up my Fox the other day looking at the multi bridle attachment rings. I should use these...I think to myself. Then I considered a multi bridle uses a sheath and lines.....too much work..too confusing. Can't I just rubber band them together?
Initial test jump? It opened.
Further testing to continue.
Basically like rigging up a tail gate with the 4 rings of the multi attachment points to hold them together upon extraction. Use about a 3 inch piece of dacron and thread it through the 4 rings. Close with a rubber band, similar tension as would be experienced on a tail gate rubber band..ie: 3-4 wraps, whatever...masking tape may get played with later on this system, but it's in initial stages.
Sheath and lines to hook up a Multi? I'm way to lazy for that.
Later,
Thomas
Tree
October 14th, 2008, 01:36 PM
What's the point? You don't need a multi in the first place. It doesn't do anything to help slider down the way it is intended to be used, so why try to invent a different way to use it? It won't likely hurt anything but it definitely won't help anything. Just cut the rings off and forget you ever saw them.
CrazyThomas
October 15th, 2008, 09:40 AM
Don't need a Multi for the bridge. No. But in other applications where heading is a concern, I think it may be useful. Is a tail gate a better option than a multi bridle? Who knows.....research continues. Since then, I have gotten lazier and cheaper. No more rubber band and dacron. And 4 rings? I just tie the back 3 together with plastic shopping bag strips and the 4th already has the bridle attached, it doesn't need anything else.
Later,
Thomas
hamsandwich
October 15th, 2008, 10:02 AM
Hey Thomas. The multi and the tailgate are designed for two completely different reasons.
The tailgate was created to address lineovers.
The multi was created to address center-cell stripping.
Good body position was created to address off-headings. :p
-
Faber
October 23rd, 2008, 07:11 AM
the multi were made to prevent centercell stripping but jumps ive made whith a multi, i always had offheaddings even by good delays when i jumped x-winds,soon as i took it off i got onheaddings.. My theorhy is that by x-wind the bridal and multi will pull sideways on the canopy forcing it to rotate either way,hence the offheadding..
The above is written by a slider off guy and therefore experince from slider off jumps,im sure it will work better on terminal jumps were it will do its work(prevent centercell stripping) and here i assume you have gained further distance to the object so a smaller offheadding shouldnt be a problem.
Should i do any jumps were headding is crusial i would deafently do so whith out the multi.
CrazyThomas
October 27th, 2008, 09:49 AM
Thanks for the reply Faber. Interesting theory about crosswind openings.
I wonder if people are using the Multi on terminal jumps? Any big wall jumpers out there using multis, or just sliders and appropriate sized pcs?
Later,
Thomas
p.s. I guess if I were truly lazy, I wouldn't use the multi at all. It's an extra step.
Huck
October 27th, 2008, 02:04 PM
My first 200 jumps were on Foxes with multi. At least 70-80 of those were s/u terminal jumps. I had "normal" openings with some dead on, some 10,20,30,40,50, etc, etc, etc. degree off-headings (one 180 on a terminal A that was uneventful). I was a big believer in the multi at first but decided to change canopies. I went with the Troll which does not have the multi. I noticed ZERO difference in the opening characteristics/performance.
IMO the multi is not necessary at all. I can see why they invented it but seems to be more of a pain in the ass than anything else. Keep the system as simple as possible.
Just my 2 pennies, hope it helps.
Good Luck!!
Andy_Copland
November 1st, 2008, 08:32 AM
I'm in an area full of jumpers who swear by the multi. I just borrowed a friends canopy and took that fucker off.
I have my own theories, along the lines of what Faber was saying and it gives me piece of mind taking it off.
Now if im hauling fucking arse off a 1500ft object im banking it would actually do a fine job. But all my objects are sub300 and the occasional slider up when i venture into Kentucky.
I have no idea if thats a good thing or not, all i do know is it gives me one less thing to worry about in my mind as i exit.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.