imported_Tom Aiello
December 5th, 1999, 10:21 AM
I was talking with a well known BASE jumper the other day.
He said he thought that pin closed rigs were not suitable for low objects. The reasoning was that pin rigs are designed for high airspeeds, and have more restrictive closures, so they could create off headings at low speeds (when they had more time to be spun by the sides of the container on deployment). [If I've gotten the logic wrong, I know he reads this board and will post a clarification.]
I usually prefer my Prism to my velcro rig for low stuff, since the pin has a lower opening force than the shrivel flap (by pull test with a spring scale) in any orientation. However, now I'm starting to wonder.
Has anyone seen any testing on this issue? Or have any personal experience or insight that might be helpful?
Thanks,
--Tom Aiello
He said he thought that pin closed rigs were not suitable for low objects. The reasoning was that pin rigs are designed for high airspeeds, and have more restrictive closures, so they could create off headings at low speeds (when they had more time to be spun by the sides of the container on deployment). [If I've gotten the logic wrong, I know he reads this board and will post a clarification.]
I usually prefer my Prism to my velcro rig for low stuff, since the pin has a lower opening force than the shrivel flap (by pull test with a spring scale) in any orientation. However, now I'm starting to wonder.
Has anyone seen any testing on this issue? Or have any personal experience or insight that might be helpful?
Thanks,
--Tom Aiello