base311
October 5th, 2001, 09:03 AM
Hey Avery, Harry, et al;
Thanks for your hard work on BD2001. Alas, it was not meant to be.
But I'm curious. In some of the news releases I've read, Bridge Day Commission Chairman Keith Spangler is quoted as saying the, "...commission wants the state to provide funding that would allow the festival to go forward this year." (AP/Charleston Daily Mail)
I am curious if you (or anyone else for that matter) has any idea what the state not covering funding has to do with this?? Do you or anyone else have any details? This is weird... I can't imagine a commission with the fiscal interests of what amounts to a tourist economy coming to a decision such as this based on a lack of (what amounts to peanuts in the scheme of BD income) funding for additional security. Frankly, I think there is something else going on. Has the state funded security supplementally in the past? Is this a cop-out/scape goat diversion from some sort of local politicking of which we are not aware??? It seemed to me that the West Virginia Governor Bob Wise's Office wasn't very sympathetic to the Commission's request (if it indeed made a legitimate request).
From the WVa Governor:
"It's not in the plans to give the commission any funding to continue considering that they decided not to have it," Wise spokeswoman Amy Shuler Goodwin said.
I think all of that is just WEIRD. WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON?
I'm also very curious who, exactly, wanted the social security and driver license numbers. Was it the Commission? or the NPS?
I will say this... I'm telling everybody I know that it was the National Park Service who shut Bridge Day 2001 down... That's the kind of dirty misinformation I like to pass along whenever possible. HEH HEH HEH
This country might as well roll over and die because everytime I turn around we allow the terrorists to have exactly what they want: EVERYBODY IS LIVING IN FEAR!!!
peace
Gardner
Thanks for your hard work on BD2001. Alas, it was not meant to be.
But I'm curious. In some of the news releases I've read, Bridge Day Commission Chairman Keith Spangler is quoted as saying the, "...commission wants the state to provide funding that would allow the festival to go forward this year." (AP/Charleston Daily Mail)
I am curious if you (or anyone else for that matter) has any idea what the state not covering funding has to do with this?? Do you or anyone else have any details? This is weird... I can't imagine a commission with the fiscal interests of what amounts to a tourist economy coming to a decision such as this based on a lack of (what amounts to peanuts in the scheme of BD income) funding for additional security. Frankly, I think there is something else going on. Has the state funded security supplementally in the past? Is this a cop-out/scape goat diversion from some sort of local politicking of which we are not aware??? It seemed to me that the West Virginia Governor Bob Wise's Office wasn't very sympathetic to the Commission's request (if it indeed made a legitimate request).
From the WVa Governor:
"It's not in the plans to give the commission any funding to continue considering that they decided not to have it," Wise spokeswoman Amy Shuler Goodwin said.
I think all of that is just WEIRD. WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON?
I'm also very curious who, exactly, wanted the social security and driver license numbers. Was it the Commission? or the NPS?
I will say this... I'm telling everybody I know that it was the National Park Service who shut Bridge Day 2001 down... That's the kind of dirty misinformation I like to pass along whenever possible. HEH HEH HEH
This country might as well roll over and die because everytime I turn around we allow the terrorists to have exactly what they want: EVERYBODY IS LIVING IN FEAR!!!
peace
Gardner